目录

  • 1 基本理论与方法
    • 1.1 循证实践概述(Introduction)
      • 1.1.1 最佳证据的涵义
      • 1.1.2 证据分级的涵义
      • 1.1.3 证据分级标准
      • 1.1.4 临床经验的涵义
      • 1.1.5 患者价值观的涵义
    • 1.2 问题构建(Forming Questions )
      • 1.2.1 问题构建技巧
      • 1.2.2 临床问题构建案例
      • 1.2.3 PICO问题构建模式
    • 1.3 证据查找(Finding the Evidence)
      • 1.3.1 各类问题的证据类型选用
      • 1.3.2 利用6S模型查找最佳证据
      • 1.3.3 证据来源选择
      • 1.3.4 PubMed数据库检索
    • 1.4 证据评价(Critical Appraisal of Evidence)
      • 1.4.1 干预性研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.2 诊断试验证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.3 危害/病因研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.4 预后研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.5 系统评价证据的评价与使用
    • 1.5 临床问题循证实践
      • 1.5.1 危害问题循证实践(Harm Scenario)
      • 1.5.2 诊断问题循证实践(Diagnosis Scenario)
      • 1.5.3 治疗问题循证实践 (Single Trials) Scenario
      • 1.5.4 治疗问题循证实践(Systematic Review) Scenario
      • 1.5.5 预后问题循证实践(Prognosis Scenario)
    • 1.6 证据综合:Meta分析
    • 1.7 循证实践案例(Practice Case)
      • 1.7.1 案例2
      • 1.7.2 案例3
    • 1.8 拓展学习工具与资源(EBM Library)
      • 1.8.1 教育处方
      • 1.8.2 自我评价方法
      • 1.8.3 EBM相关计算工具
      • 1.8.4 术语
  • 2 实践探索
    • 2.1 循证护理
    • 2.2 循证全科医学
    • 2.3 循证补充替代医学
    • 2.4 循证外科
    • 2.5 循证老年医学
    • 2.6 循证采购
    • 2.7 循证新生儿学
    • 2.8 循证精神卫生
    • 2.9 循证危重症
    • 2.10 发展中国家的EBM
  • 3 课程课件
    • 3.1 循证医学概述
    • 3.2 问题构建
    • 3.3 证据分类分级
    • 3.4 证据来源与检索
    • 3.5 医学研究设计概述
    • 3.6 疾病的测量与分布
    • 3.7 病因与病因推断
    • 3.8 描述性研究
    • 3.9 队列研究
    • 3.10 病例对照研究
    • 3.11 实验性研究
    • 3.12 诊断性试验
    • 3.13 诊断问题循证实践
    • 3.14 预后研究
  • 4 教学视频
    • 4.1 循证医学总论
    • 4.2 问题的构建
    • 4.3 证据的检索
    • 4.4 患者价值观与意愿
    • 4.5 病因研究证据的评价与应用
    • 4.6 诊断性证据的评价与应用
    • 4.7 防治性证据的评价与应用
    • 4.8 预后研究证据的评价与应用
    • 4.9 患者安全
证据查找(Finding the Evidence)

循证实践的第二步是证据查找 ,检索词的选用需要参考问题构建时的PICO四个要素。It is important when searching for evidence that search terms are referred back to your original PICO question. 

In the previous section, we learned how to construct a well-built clinical question. Using that question, we will move on to the literature search. 

案例:

In patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, is bariatric surgery more effective than standard medical therapy at increasing the probability of remission of diabetes? It is a therapy question and the best evidence would be a randomized controlled trial (RCT). If we found numerous RCTs, then we might want to look for a systematic review. 

 Constructing a well-built clinical question can lead directly to a well-built search strategy. Note that you may not use all the information in PICO or well-built clinical question in your MEDLINE strategy. In the following example we did not use the term “male.” We also did not include the word therapy. Instead we used the Clinical Query for Therapy or the publication type, randomized controlled trial, to get at the concept of treatment. However, you may consider the issue of gender later when you review the articles for applicability to your patient. 

PICO

Clinical Question

Search Strategy

Patient / Problemobese, diabetes type 2, male

diabetes type 2, obesity

Interventionstomach stapling (gastric bypass surgery; bariatric surgery)bariatric surgery
Comparison (if any)standard medical care
Outcomeremission of diabetes; weight loss; mortality
Type of Questiontherapy(see below)
Type of StudyRCTClinical Query – Therapy/narrow
or
Limit to randomized controlled trial as publication type


证据查找的三个主要步骤:

1. Identify terms to fit your PICO question

2. Look for secondary sources

3. Search for primary sources

1.  Identify terms to fit your PICO question 

PatientInterventionComparisonOutcome





2.  Look for secondary sources

3.Search for Primary Sources

Use methodological filters to target the right type of study. For instance, PubMED filters for:

  • therapy

  • diagnosis

  • prognosis

  • etiology