目录

  • 1 基本理论与方法
    • 1.1 循证实践概述(Introduction)
      • 1.1.1 最佳证据的涵义
      • 1.1.2 证据分级的涵义
      • 1.1.3 证据分级标准
      • 1.1.4 临床经验的涵义
      • 1.1.5 患者价值观的涵义
    • 1.2 问题构建(Forming Questions )
      • 1.2.1 问题构建技巧
      • 1.2.2 临床问题构建案例
      • 1.2.3 PICO问题构建模式
    • 1.3 证据查找(Finding the Evidence)
      • 1.3.1 各类问题的证据类型选用
      • 1.3.2 利用6S模型查找最佳证据
      • 1.3.3 证据来源选择
      • 1.3.4 PubMed数据库检索
    • 1.4 证据评价(Critical Appraisal of Evidence)
      • 1.4.1 干预性研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.2 诊断试验证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.3 危害/病因研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.4 预后研究证据的评价与使用
      • 1.4.5 系统评价证据的评价与使用
    • 1.5 临床问题循证实践
      • 1.5.1 危害问题循证实践(Harm Scenario)
      • 1.5.2 诊断问题循证实践(Diagnosis Scenario)
      • 1.5.3 治疗问题循证实践 (Single Trials) Scenario
      • 1.5.4 治疗问题循证实践(Systematic Review) Scenario
      • 1.5.5 预后问题循证实践(Prognosis Scenario)
    • 1.6 证据综合:Meta分析
    • 1.7 循证实践案例(Practice Case)
      • 1.7.1 案例2
      • 1.7.2 案例3
    • 1.8 拓展学习工具与资源(EBM Library)
      • 1.8.1 教育处方
      • 1.8.2 自我评价方法
      • 1.8.3 EBM相关计算工具
      • 1.8.4 术语
  • 2 实践探索
    • 2.1 循证护理
    • 2.2 循证全科医学
    • 2.3 循证补充替代医学
    • 2.4 循证外科
    • 2.5 循证老年医学
    • 2.6 循证采购
    • 2.7 循证新生儿学
    • 2.8 循证精神卫生
    • 2.9 循证危重症
    • 2.10 发展中国家的EBM
  • 3 课程课件
    • 3.1 循证医学概述
    • 3.2 问题构建
    • 3.3 证据分类分级
    • 3.4 证据来源与检索
    • 3.5 医学研究设计概述
    • 3.6 疾病的测量与分布
    • 3.7 病因与病因推断
    • 3.8 描述性研究
    • 3.9 队列研究
    • 3.10 病例对照研究
    • 3.11 实验性研究
    • 3.12 诊断性试验
    • 3.13 诊断问题循证实践
    • 3.14 预后研究
  • 4 教学视频
    • 4.1 循证医学总论
    • 4.2 问题的构建
    • 4.3 证据的检索
    • 4.4 患者价值观与意愿
    • 4.5 病因研究证据的评价与应用
    • 4.6 诊断性证据的评价与应用
    • 4.7 防治性证据的评价与应用
    • 4.8 预后研究证据的评价与应用
    • 4.9 患者安全
问题构建(Forming Questions )

Question development is an integral part of an effective search. On this page, you'll find information on the different types of questions you might ask, along with templates and tools for question formation.

A good question...

  • Focuses your information needs

  • Identifies key search concepts

  • Points you in the direction of potential resources

背景问题 Background Questions

These questions are general in nature and provide foundational information on a single concept. Background questions cover:

  • Terminology

  • General Pathology

  • Patient Education Resources

  • General Drug Information

  • Examination/Assessment Procedures

Examples

What is the pathology of asthma?

What drugs are used to treat hypertension?

How do I perform a psychological assessment?

What education resources exist for patients with gestational diabetes?

How is hepititis B diagnosed?

What does a normal heartbeat sound like?

前景问题 Foreground Questions

These questions bring together multiple concepts related to a specific clinical situation or research topic.  They are typically divided into two categories:

  • Qualitative Questions aim to discover meaning or gain an understanding of a phenomena.  They ask about an individual's or population's experience of certain situations or circumstances

  • Quantitative Questions aim to discover cause and effect relationships by comparing two or more individuals or groups based on differing outcomes associated with exposures or interventions.

These questions are best answered using the resources found in the 6S Pyramid page of this guide.

前景问题构建

Building an effective foreground question can be challenging.The following models will help:

定性问题(Qualitative Questions): The PS Model

P - Patient/Population

S- Situation

How do/does ___[P]____ experience _____[S]_____?

Ex. How do caregiver-spouses of Alzheimer patients experience placing their spouse in a nursing home?


定量问题(Quantitative Questions): The PICO(T) Model

A quantitative approach can answer many different types of questions, but all can be formatted by following the PICO(T) Model outlined below:     

 

PICO涵义

  • Patient, Population or Problem

    • What are the characteristics of the patient or population?

    • What is the condition or disease you are interested in?

  • Intervention or exposure

    • What do you want to do with this patient (e.g. treat, diagnose, observe)?

  • Comparison

    • What is the alternative to the intervention (e.g. placebo, different drug, surgery)?

  • Outcome

    • What are the relevant outcomes (e.g. morbidity, death, complications)?

Examples

Example 1

Your next patient is a 72-year-old woman with osteoarthritis of the knees and moderate hypertension, accompanied by her daughter, a lab tech from the hospital. The daughter wants you to give her mother a prescription for one of the new COX-2 inhibitors. She has heard that they cause less GI bleeding. Her mother is concerned that the new drugs will mean more out of pocket costs each month.


Patient/ProblemInterventionComparison InterventionOutcome
72 year old woman with osteoarthritis of the knee and moderate hypertensionCOX-2 Inhibitorother NSAIDS
  • less GI bleeding

  • pain control

Specific Question:In a 72 year old woman with osteoarthritis of the knee, can COX-2 Inhibitor use decrease the risk of GI Bleeding compared with other NSAIDs?

Example 2

You have been treating a 54-year old woman for many years and despite the excellence of your fixed partial denture restorations, the intense routine maintenance by her periodontist, and good homecare, she has been experiencing a continued deterioration of her periodontal tissues. Her attempts to quit smoking have been unsuccessful; otherwise she is in good health and taking no medications. Because you are her primary care dentist, she has questioned you about her current dilemma. The periodontist has suggested a 3-week course of doxycycline therapy to control her latest exacerbation of periodontal disease, but she is concerned about Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports asking for prudent use of antibiotics. How do you advise this patient?


Patient/ProblemInterventionComparison InterventionOutcome
54 year old woman with exacerbation of periodontal diseasedoxycylineno treatment
  • less gum bleeding

  • stop recession

Specific Question:For a 54 year old woman with periodontal disease, how effective is the therapeutic use of doxcyline decrease gum bleeding and recession compared to no treatment?

PICO(T) 问题构建模板

Therapy

In ___[P]___,  do/does ___[I]___ result in ___[O]____ when compared with ___[C]___ over ___[T]____?

E.g.) In nursing home residents with osteoporosis, do hip protectors result in fewer injuries from slips, trips, and fallswhen compared with standard osteoporosis drug therapy over the course of their stay?

Etiology

Are ___[P]___  with  ___[I]___  over ____[T]____ more likely to ___[O]____ when compared with ___[C]___ ?

E.g.) Are female non-smokers with daily exposure to second-hand smoke over a period of ten years or greater more likely to develop breast cancer when compared with female non-smokers without daily exposure to second-hand smoke?

Diagnosis

Is/are ___[I]___ performed on ___[P]___   more effective than ___[C]___  over ___[T]____in ___[O]____?

E.g.) Are self-reporting interviews and parent reports performed on children aged 5-10 more effective than parent reports alone over a four-week consultation process in diagnosing depression?

Prevention

In ___[P]___,  do/does ___[I]___ result in ___[O]____ when compared with ___[C]___ over ___[T]____?

E.g.) In emergency room visitors, do hand sanitizing stations result in fewer in-hospital infections when compared with no hand sanitizing stations over a year-long pilot period?

Prognosis

Do/does ___[I]___ performed on ___[P]___   lead to  ___[O]___  over ___[T]____compared with ___[C]____?

E.g.) Do regular text message reminders performed on patients recently diagnosed with diabetes lead to a lower occurrence of forgotten insulin doses over the first six months of treatment compared with no reminders?


问题的种类 

临床问题的类型和对应的研究类型是问题构建的好的两个重要要素,这有助于聚焦问题和选择最佳证据类型。不同种类临床问题对应的最佳研究设计类型如下表。

常见临床问题类型:研究类型(Type of study
诊断(Diagnosis
how to select and interpret diagnostic tests

前瞻性与金标准双盲比较/横断面研

prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard or cross-sectional

治疗(Therapy
how to select treatments that do more good than harm and that are worth the efforts and costs of using them
randomized controlled trial (随机对照试验)> cohort study(队列研究)
预后(Prognosis
how to estimate the patient’s likely clinical course over time (based on factors other than the intervention) and anticipate likely complications of disease
cohort study (队列研究)> case control (病例对照)> case series(病例系列)
病因/危害(Harm/Etiology
how to identify causes for disease (including iatrogenic forms)
cohort (队列研究)> case control(病例对照) > case series(病例系列)