1
法律英语阅读与翻译教程
1.4.2 附录二:法庭电影——影像中的正义

附录二:法庭电影——影像中的正义

一、概述

法庭电影(courtroom drama)往往通过对个案的通俗分析,以阐释法律文化。法庭电影以“娱乐化”的方式为大众提供了一种了解法律和法律职业的途径。通过观看法庭电影,尤其是美国的法庭电影,我们可以获得美国法律历史和法律文化的相关知识。

比如,《杀死一只知更鸟》(To Kill a Mocking Bird)等电影就反映了正义与种族观念的傲慢与偏见的冲突;《追魂交易》(Devil's Advocate)等电影反映了法律信仰和生活现实之间的两难抉择;《纽伦堡审判》(Judgment at Nuremberg)、《极度重罪》(High Crimes)等电影反映了责任和良心的磨难;而《左拉传》(The Life of Emile Zola)、《四季之人》(A Man for all Seasons)等电影则反映了政治压力下的司法体制的脆弱。又如《鹈鹕案卷》(Pelican Brief(又译《塘鹅暗杀令》或《绝对机密》))、《连锁阴谋》(Conspiracy Theory)等电影表达的是对政府权力运作的不信任;而《费城故事》(Philadelphia)、《双重危险》(Double Jeopardy)等电影表达了美国人民为权利和为法律(权利)而斗争的价值追求。

除了反映美国法律文化、政治体制、意识形态之外,法庭电影还可以生动地再现法庭辩护中唇枪舌剑的场景:穿着笔挺西装的律师和政府的检察官在严肃的法庭上雄辩滔滔。《好人无几》(A Few Good Men)、《我要求审判》(Nuts)、《真情假爱》(Intolerable Cruelty)、《诱惑法则》(Laws of Attraction)、《律政俏佳人》(Legally Blonde)等众多好莱坞法律电影作品为我们描绘了一场场在法庭上演的引人入胜的辩论对抗赛:律师们唇枪舌剑,旁征博引,慷慨陈词。这一具有强烈冲击效果的诉讼场景吸引了无数的观众,也吸引着他们对法律和律师职业的兴趣和向往。

总之,法庭电影赋予了法律以肉体、血液与灵魂。通过观看和欣赏好的法庭电影,不仅能帮助我们比较直观地了解法律文化的独特性,而且也能大大丰富我们对法律的理解和想象。

二、《杀死一只知更鸟》法庭辩论部分剧本

1.背景介绍

电影根据哈柏·李(Harper Lee)的同名畅销小说改编。小说于1960年出版,1961年获得普利策奖,1962年就被搬上银幕。时至今日,这部小说已被翻译成40多种文字,发行量超过一千五百万册,成为公认的美国文学经典。

20世纪30年代的美国南部歧视黑人的现象十分严重。一天,阿提克斯·芬奇(Atticus Finch)去法院为黑人汤姆·罗宾逊(Tom Robinson)当辩护律师。白人检察官指控汤姆·罗宾逊强奸了鲍伯·尤厄尔(Bob Ewell)的女儿玛依拉·尤厄尔(Mayella Ewell),阿提克斯·芬奇经过认真调查,发现事实并非如此。于是,在法庭上,他实事求是地进行辩护,把对汤姆·罗宾逊的指控一一加以驳斥,最后他要求判汤姆无罪,并且义正词严地呼吁人们要尊重事实,要维护人类的尊严与平等。可是法官与陪审团都偏信原告的“证词”,仍判汤姆·罗宾逊有罪。

2.法庭询问(examination)的形式

在英美的诉讼法中,法庭询问通常有两种形式,即direct examination(直接询问)和crossexamination(交叉询问、交叉诘问、反反询问)。cross examination是英美法系诉讼中的一项重要制度,是指有关双方当事人对证人交叉盘问的一整套规范。不管是刑事案件还是民事案件,在通常的诉讼程序,只要有证人出庭,都将进行对证人的交叉询问。

由于交叉询问是一种专业很强的法庭技术,所以一般对证人交叉询问都是由双方律师进行。交叉询问首先由申请提出该证人(也称为“己方证人”)的当事人(通常是该当事人的律师)对该证人进行询问,称之为“主询问”(direct examination; examination in chief),然后由对方当事人的律师对该证人进行询问,称为“反询问”(cross-examination)。最初询问证人的当事人或律师还可以对证人进行再询问,称为“再主询问”(redirect examination);再主询问之后,也允许实施反对询问的当事人或律师实施再反询问(recross-examination)。

主询问的目的主要是通过对证人的询问,使该证人将有利于己方的有关案件事实反映出来,作出支持自己主张的证言,以取得陪审团或法官的理解。反询问则相反,主要有两个目的:其一,通过反询问,发现证人证词的破绽,以达到证言无效,或使陪审团或法官对该证言持有怀疑的目的,或通过询问以否定证人的作证资格;其二,从反询问中发现或找出有利于自己的事实。虽然对方提供的证人一般总是支持对方主张的,但由于如实作证的证人毕竟是案件事实的见证人,因此,有可能从中发现或找到有利于己方的证言事实,变控方证人为辩方证人(在民事案件中则是原告证人变为被告证人)。

3.庭审的具体步骤

步骤 内容
STEP 1 控告方先举证,控告方直接询问控方证人(direct examination of prosecution witnesses by the prosecutor)
STEP 2 辩护方交叉询问控方证人(cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses by the defense)
STEP 3 控方再次直接询问(redirect)
STEP 4 控方举证完毕(The prosecution finishes presenting its case)
STEP 5 辩护方可能会申请法院驳回控方的起诉(The defense makes a motion to dismiss charges. ——Optional)
STEP 6 法官常拒绝辩护方驳回公诉动议(The judge denies the defense motion to dismiss.)
STEP 7 辩护方举证,辩护方直接询问辩方证人(direct examination of defense witnesses by the defense)
STEP 8 控方交叉询问辩方证人(cross-examination of the defense witnesses by the prosecution)
STEP 9 辩方再次直接询问(redirect)
STEP 10 辩方举证完毕(The defense finishes presenting its case)
STEP 11 控方提出证据反驳辩护方(The prosecutor offers evidence to refute the defense case)
STEP 12 就陪审团指示控、辩、审三方达议(The prosecution and defense get together with the judge and craft a final set of instructions that the judge will give the jury)(1)
STEP 13 控方终结辩论(The prosecution makes its closing argument, summarizing the evidence as the prosecution sees it, and explaining why the jury should render a guilty verdict)
STEP 14 辩护方终结辩论(The defense makes its closing argument, summarizing the evidence as the defense sees it, and explaining why the jury should render a not guilty verdict—or at least a guilty verdict on a lesser charge)
STEP 15 法官向陪审团做出指示(The judge instructs the jury about what law to apply to the case and how to carry out its duties. Some judges “pre-instruct” juries, reciting instructions before closing argument or even at the outset of trial)
STEP 16 陪审团评议(The jury(if it is a jury trial)deliberates and tries to reach a verdict. Most states require unanimous agreement, but Oregon and Louisiana allow convictions with only 10 of 12 votes)
STEP 17 辩护方提出审判后动议(If the jury produces a guilty verdict, the defense often makes posttrial motions requesting the judge to override the jury and either grant a new trial or acquit the defendant)
STEP 18 法官通常会驳回审判后动议(Almost always, the judge denies the defense post-trial motions.)
STEP 19 法官量刑(Assuming a conviction(a verdict of “guilty”), the judge either sentences the defendant on the spot, or sets sentencing for another day)
关键词总结庭审步骤 case in chief: directexamination→cross-examination→redirect→prosecution rests→motion to dismiss→denial of motion to dismiss→defense case-in-chief: direct examination→cross-examination→redirect→defense rests→prosecution rebuttal→settling on jury instructions→prosecution closing argument→defense closing argument→jury instructions→jury deliberations→post-trial motions→denial of post-trial motions→sentencing.

4.剧本节选

Atticus Finch defends Tom Robinson who is falsely accused of raping Mayella Ewell.

——direct of Sheriff Tate——

On the night of August 21st, I was just leaving my office to go home when Bob, Mr.Ewell, came in. Very excited he was, and he said to get to his house as quick as I could. That his girl had been raped. I got in my car and went out there as fast as I could. She was pretty well beat up. I asked her if Tom Robinson beat her like that. She said yes, he had. I asked if hed taken advantage of her. She said yes, he did. That's all there was to it.

Prosecutor: Thank you.

——cross——

Defense: Did anybody call a doctor, sheriff?

A: No sir.

Q: Why not?

A: Well I didn't think it was necessary. She was pretty well beat up. Something sure happened—it was ugly.

Q: Now Sheriff, you say she was mighty beat up. In what way?

A: Well she was beaten around the head. There was bruises already coming out her arms. She had a black eye starting.

Q: Which eye?

A: Well she, her left.

Q: Well, now, was that was her left facing you, or looking the way that you were?

A: I guess that would make it her right eye. It was her right eye, Mr.Pierce. She was beaten up that side of her face.

Q: Which side again, Hank?

A: The right side. She had bruises on her arms. She showed me her neck. There were definite finger marks on her gullet.

Q: All around her neck at the back of the throat?

A: I'd say they were all around.

Judge: Witness may be seated.

——direct of Bob Ewell——

Bailiff: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god?

A: I do.

Bailiff: Sit down please.

Q: Now, Mr.Ewell, you tell us, just in your own words what happened on August 21st.

A: Well, that night I was coming in from the wood with a load of kindling and I heard Mayella screaming as I got to the fence. So I dropped my kindling and I run just as fast as I could but I run into the fence. When I got loose I run up to the window and I seen him with my Mayella.(pointing at defendant).

Q: What did you do after you saw the defendant?

A: I run around the house trying to get in but he done run through the front door just ahead of me. But I seen who it was all right. I seen him. And I run in the house and pulled Mayella up and I run for Mr.Teagues just as quick as I could.

Prosecutor: Thank you Mr.Ewell.

——cross——

Q: Folks were doing a lot of running that night. Let's see now, you say that you ran to the house, you rant to the window, you ran inside. You ran to Mayella. Since you were doing all this running why didn't you run to the doctor?

A: Wasn't no need to. I saw who done it.

Q: Do you agree with the sheriff's description?

A: I agree with everything Mr.Tate said. Mighty beat up.

Q: All right now, Mr.Ewell. Can you read and write.

A: Yes Mr.Finch, I can read and I can write.

Q: Good. Then would you write your name. Right there. Would you show us? (Witness writes his name with his left hand.)

Q: You are lefthanded, Mr.Ewell.

A: What's that got to do with that, judge? Im a godfearing man. Atticus Finch is trying to take advantage of me. You got to watch tricky lawyers like Atticus Finch.

Judge: Quiet, quiet, then. The witness may take his seat.

——direct of victim——

Bailiff: Mayella Ewell. Put your hand on the Bible please. Do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth so help you god?

(Mayella nods.)

Prosecution: Now Mayella suppose you tell us just what happened, huh?

A: Well, Sir, I was sitting on the porch and he come along there was this old shifarobe in the yard and I said. You come in here boy and bust up this shifarobe and I'll give you a nickel and he came on in the yard and went in the house to get the nickel and I turn around before I know it he's on me and I fought and hollered but he had me around the neck and he hit me again and again. And the next thing I knew papa's in the room standing over me hollering, “Who done it? Who done it?”

Prosecution: Thank you Mayella. Your witness, Atticus.

Defense: Now Miss Mayella, is your father good to you? I mean, is he easy to get along with?

A: Just tolerable.

Q: Except when he's drinking. When he's riled, has he ever beaten you?

A: My pa's never touched a hair on my head in my life.

Q: Your saying you asked Tom to come in and chop up a—what was it?

A: A shifarobe.

Q: Was that the first time that you ever asked him to come inside the fence?

A: Yes.

Q: Didn't you ever ask him to come inside the fence before?

A: I might've.

Q: Can you remember any other occasion?

A: No.

Q: You say, “He caught me, he choked me, and he took advantage of me,” is that right? Do you remember him beating you about the face?

A: No, I don't recollect if he hit me. I mean yes, he hit me, he hit me.

Q: Thank you. Now will you identify the man who beat you.

A: I will. I most certainly will. Sitting right yonder.

(She points at Tom)

Q: Tom, will you stand up please. Let Miss Mayella have a good long look at you. Tom, will you catch this please?(Atticus throws a glass to Tom, who catches it with his right hand.) Thank you. Now then, this time will you please catch it with your left hand?

Defendant: I can't, sir.

Q: Why can't you?

A: I can't use my left hand at all. I got it caught in a cotton gin when I was 12 years old. All my muscles were tore loose.

Q [to Mayella]: Is this the man who raped you?

A: It most certainly is.

Q: How?

A: I don't know how. He done it he done it.

Q: You have testified that he choked you and he beat you. You didn't say that he sneaked up behind you and he knocked you out cold but that you turned around and there he was. You want to tell us what really happened?

A: (Crying) I got something to say and then I ain't gonna say no more. He took advantage of me and if you fine fancy gentlemen ain't gonna do nothing about it, then youre just a bunch of lousy yellow stinking cowards the whole bunch of you and your fancy airs don't come to nothing. Your manners and your Miss Mayellas, it don't come to nothing, Mr.Finch(She breaks down.)

Judge: Sit down there. Atticus? Mr.Gilmer.

Prosecution: The state rests, Judge.

——direct of accused——

Bailiff: Tom Robinson, take the stand. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god?

A: I do.

Bailiff: Sit down.

Q: Now Tom, were you acquainted with Mayella Violet Ewell?

A: Yes sir. I had to pass her place going to it from the field every day.

Q: Is there any other way to go?

A: No sir, none's I know of.

Q: And did she ever speak to you?

A: Why yes, sir. I tipped my hat when I go by. Then one day she asked me to come in and bust up a shifarobe for her. She gave me the hatchet and I broke it up. And then she said I reckon I'll have to give you a nickel, won't I?

Q: I said, “No maam, there ain't no charge.”

A: Then I went home. Mr.Finch, that was way last spring, way over a year ago.

Q: And did you ever go on the place again?

A: Yes sir.

Q: When?

A: Well, I, I went lots of times. It seemed like every time I passed by yonder, shed have some little something for me to do, chopping kindling and toting water for her.

Q: Tom, what happened to you on the evening of August 21st, last year?

A: Finch, I was going home as usual that evening, when I passed the Ewell place, with Mayella on the porch, like she said she was. And she said for me to come there and help her a minute. Well, I went inside the fence and I looked around for some kindling to work on, but I didn't see none. And then she said to come in the house, she has a door needs fixing, so I follows her inside and I looked at the door, and it looked all right. Then she shut the door. All the time, I was wondering why it was so quiet-like. Then it come to me. There was not a child on the place. And I said, Miss Mayella, where are the children. She said, they all gone to get ice cream. She said it took her a slap year to save seven nickels, but she done it, and they all gone to town.

Q: What did you say then?

A: Uh, I said something like, uh, “Why Miss Mayella, that's right nice of you to treat ‘em.” She said, “You think so?” “Well,” I said, “I best be going.” I couldn't do nothing for her and she said Oh yes I could, and I asked her what. And she said to just step on the chair yonder and get that box down from on top of the shifarobe. So I done like she told me and I was reaching, when the next thing I know she grabbed me around the legs. She scared me so bad I hopped down and turned the chair over. That was the only thing, the only furniture disturbed in the room, Mr.Finch, I swear, when I left it.

Q: And what happened after you turned the chair over? Tom? Youve sworn to tell the whole truth. Will you do it? What happened after that?

A: Mr.Finch. I got down off the chair and I turned around. And she sort of jumped on me and hugged me around the waist. She reached up and kissed me on the face. She said shed never kissed a grown man before and she might as well kiss me. She asked for me to kiss her back. I said, “Miss Mayella let me out of here.” And I tried to run. Mr.Ewell cussed at her from the window, said he's gonna kill her.

Q: And what happened after that?

A: I was running so fast, I don't know what happened.

Q: Tom, did you rape Mayella Ewell?

A: I did not, sir.

Q: Did you harm her in any way?

A: I did not.

——cross——

Prosecution (who has had his feet up on his chair, dangling off the side.): Mr.Robinson, youre pretty good at busting up shifarobes and kindling with one hand, aren't you? Strong enough to choke the breath out of a woman and sling her to the floor?

A: I never done that sir.

Q: But you're strong enough to.

A: I reckon so, sir.

Q: Uh-huh. How come you so all-fired anxious to do that woman's chores?

A: Looks like she didn't have nobody to help her. Like I said, she—

Q: With Mr.Ewell and seven children on the place? You did all this chopping and work out of sheer goodness, boy? You a mighty good fella, it seems. You did all that for not one penny?

A: Yes sir. I felt right sorry for her. She seemed—

Q: You felt sorry for her? A white woman? You felt sorry for her?

——defense closing argument——

To begin with, this case should never have come to trial. The state has not produced one iota of medical evidence that the crime Tom Robinson is charged with ever took place. It has relied instead upon the testimony of two witnesses whose evidence has not only been called into serious question on cross examination, but has been flatly contradicted by the defendant. There is circumstantial evidence to indicate that Mayella Ewell was beaten savagely by someone who led almost exclusively with his left. And Tom Robinson now sits before you, having taken the oath with the only good hand he possesses, his right. I have nothing but pity in my heart for the chief witness for the state. She is the victim of cruel poverty and ignorance. But my pity does not extend so far as to her putting a man's life at stake, which she has done in an effort to get rid of her own guilt, I say guilt, gentleman, because it was guilt that motivated her. She has committed no crime. She has merely broken a rigid and timehonored code of our society, a code so severe is hounded from our midst, is unfit to live with. She must destroy the evidence of her offense. But what was the evidence of her offense? Tom Robinson, a human being. She must put Tom Robinson away from her.

Tom Robinson was to her a daily reminder of what she did. Now what did she do? She tempted a Negro. She was white and she tempted a negro. She did something that in our society was unspeakable. She kissed a black man. Not an old uncle, but a strong young Negro man. No code mattered to her before she broke it, but it came crashing down on her afterwards. The witnesses for the state, with the exception of the sheriff for Macon county, have presented themselves to you gentleman, to this court, in the cynical confidence that their testimony would not be doubted. Confident that you gentleman would go along with them on the assumption, the evil assumption, that all Negroes lie, that all negroes are all basically immoral beings. All Negro men are not to be trusted around our women. That assumption one associates with minds of their caliber, and which is in itself a lie, which I do not need to point out to you. And so, a quiet, humble, respectable Negro who has had the unmitigated temerity to feel sorry for a white woman has had to put his word against two white people. The defendant is not guilty, but somebody in this courtroom is. Now gentleman, in this country, our courts are the great levelers. In our courts, all men are created equal. Im no idealist to believe firmly in the integrity of our courts and our jury system. That's no ideal to me, that is a living, working reality. Now I am confident that you gentlemen will review without passion the evidence that you have heard, come to a decision, and restore this man to his family. In the name of God do your duty. In the name of God believe Tom Robinson.

三、《美国律师协会杂志》推荐的最佳法律电影

ABA journal's List of the 25 Greatest Legal Movies

《美国律师协会杂志》2008年8月号封面文章《25部伟大的法律电影》一文为读者推荐了一些不错的法律电影,现将名单转列如下:

1. To Kill a Mockingbird(1962)

2. 12 Angry Men(1957)

3. My Cousin Vinny(1992)

4. Anatomy of a Murder(1959)

5. Inherit the Wind(1960)

6. Witness for the Prosecution(1957)

7. Breaker Morant(1980)

8. Philadelphia(1993)

9. Erin Brockovich(2000)

10. The Verdict(1982)

11. Presumed Innocent(1990)

12. Judgment at Nuremberg(1961)

13. A Man for All Seasons(1966)

14. A Few Good Men(1992)

15. Chicago(2002)

16. Kramer vs. Kramer(1979)

17. The Paper Chase(1973)

18. Reversal of Fortune(1990)

19. Compulsion(1959)

20. And Justice for All(1979)

21. In the Name of the Father(1993)

22. A Civil Action(1998)

23. Young Mr. Lincoln(1939)

24. Amistad(1997)

25. Miracle on 34th Street(1947)

ABA Journal's List of Honorable Mentions

1. The Accused(1998)

2. Adam's Rib(1949)

3. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt(1956)

4. The Caine Mutiny(1954)

5. Class Action(1991)

6. The Client(1994)

7. Counsellor at Law(1993)

8. The Court-Martial of Billy Mitchell(1955)

9. The Devil's Advocate(1997)

10. The Firm(1993)

11. The Fortune Cookie(1966)

12. Ghosts of Mississippi(1996)

13. Intolerable Gruelty(2003)

14. Jagged Edge(1985)

15. JFK(1991)

16. Legally Blonde(2001)

17. Liar, Liar(1997)

18. Michael Clayton(2007)

19. Music Box(1989)

20. North Country(2005)

21. The Pelican Brief(1993)

22. The People vs. Larry Flint(1996)

23. Primal Fear(1996)

24. The Rainmaker(1997)

25. A Time to Kill(1996)

中文出版物中,推荐两部相关书籍。一是朱靖江翻译的《影像中的正义》(伯格曼和艾莫斯著),海南出版社2003年版;第二部是徐昕主编的《影像中的司法》,清华大学出版社2006年版。台湾元照出版社2002年还出版过一本《看电影学法律》。

————————————————————

(1) The prosecution and defense get together with the judge and figure out what instructions the judge should give the jury.