目录

  • 1 国际法的性质与发展
    • 1.1 国际法的历史与概念
    • 1.2 中国与国际法
    • 1.3 国际法是真正的法律吗?
    • 1.4 1.1-1.4课件
  • 2 国际法的渊源
    • 2.1 为什么法律渊源很重要?
    • 2.2 条约是国际法吗?
    • 2.3 习惯国际法的种类
    • 2.4 2.1-2.4课件
  • 3 国际法与国内法的关系
    • 3.1 国际法与国内法哪个大?
    • 3.2 吸收与转化
    • 3.3 边境管制执法的国际影响
    • 3.4 3.1-3.4课件
  • 4 国际法基本原则
    • 4.1 渊源的适用
    • 4.2 (Jessup)主权的历史、现在与未来
    • 4.3 保护基本人权是新原则吗?
    • 4.4 当主权遇上人道主义
  • 5 国际法的主体
    • 5.1 成立的要素
    • 5.2 争取独立的民族?
    • 5.3 个人主体的未来?
    • 5.4 NGO的求偿权问题
  • 6 国际法上的国家
    • 6.1 国家一律平等吗?
    • 6.2 现代国家有哪些国际法义务?
    • 6.3 主权管辖可以由国内法豁免吗?
    • 6.4 承认与继承
  • 7 国际法上的个人
    • 7.1 个人的国籍
    • 7.2 外国人的法律地位与待遇
    • 7.3 引渡与庇护
    • 7.4 难民
  • 8 条约法
    • 8.1 条约的缔结
    • 8.2 保留与生效
    • 8.3 遵守与适用
    • 8.4 解释与修订
    • 8.5 案例模拟(中英联合申明)
  • 9 外交与领事关系法
    • 9.1 和平国际法的源头
    • 9.2 外交机关与人员
    • 9.3 特权与豁免
    • 9.4 领事新闻
    • 9.5 案例模拟(大使馆耶路撒冷)
  • 10 国际责任法
    • 10.1 渊源
    • 10.2 国际不法行为责任
    • 10.3 国际损害行为责任
    • 10.4 追究机制
    • 10.5 案例辩论(日本排放)
  • 11 国际刑法
    • 11.1 人权法与人道法
    • 11.2 基本原则
    • 11.3 国际罪行
    • 11.4 归责原则
    • 11.5 案例辩论(ICC普京)
  • 12 国际人道法
    • 12.1 渊源与范围
    • 12.2 战争受难者与战俘
    • 12.3 作战手段与方法
    • 12.4 答疑
主权管辖可以由国内法豁免吗?

Three Communiqués

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

The Three Communiqués or Three Joint Communiqués (Chinese三个联合公报) are a collection of three joint statements made by the governments of the United States and the People's Republic of China (P.R.C.). The communiqués played a crucial role in the establishment of relations between the U.S. and the P.R.C. and continue to be an essential element in dialogue between the two states, along with the Six Assurances and Taiwan Relations Act.[1]

Contents

1st[edit]

The first communiqué (February 28, 1972), known as the Shanghai Communiqué, summarizes the landmark dialogue begun by President Richard Nixon and Premier Zhou Enlai during February 1972. Some of the issues addressed in this communiqué include the two sides' views on Vietnam, the Korean PeninsulaIndia and Pakistan and the Kashmir region, and perhaps most importantly, the Taiwan (Republic of China) issue (i.e., Taiwan's political status). Essentially, both sides agreed to respect each other's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. The United States formally acknowledged that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China".

The use of the word "acknowledge" (rather than "accept") is often cited as an example of the United States' ambiguous position regarding the future of Taiwan.[1]

2nd[edit]

Deng Xiaoping and Jimmy Carter during the Sino-American signing ceremony

The second communiqué (January 1, 1979), the Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations, formally announces the commencement of normal relations between the United States and the People's Republic of China. In so doing, the United States recognized that the government of the People's Republic of China was the sole legal government of China. In addition, the United States government declared that it would end formal political relations with the Republic of China ("Taiwan") while preserving economic and cultural ties. Both sides reaffirmed their wish to reduce the risk of international conflict as well as avoidance of hegemony of any nation in the Asia-Pacific region.

3rd[edit]

The third and final communiqué (August 17, 1982), also known as August 17th communiqué, reaffirms the desire of both sides to further strengthen economic, cultural, educational, scientific, and technological ties. Both sides also reaffirmed the statements made about the Taiwan issue in the previous communiqué. Although no definitive conclusions were reached on the issue of arms sale to Taiwan, the United States did declare its intent to gradually decrease its sale of arms to Taiwan.

A declassified cable sent on July 10, 1982 from Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger to AIT director James R. Lilley explained that reducing arms sales to Taiwan would be contingent on the commitment of the PRC to a peace across the Taiwan Strait.[2] Afterwards, the US unilaterally complemented the third communique by issuing the Six Assurances to Taiwan.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b deLisle, Jacques. "Trump, Tsai, and the Three Communiques: Prospects for Stability in US-China-Taiwan Relations"Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2021.

  2. ^ "Declassified Cables: Taiwan Arms Sales & Six Assurances (1982)"American Institute in Taiwan. Retrieved January 10, 2021.

管辖权:立法、行政、司法

立法:法国人的例子,汽车

行政:艾希曼的例子,本拉登的例子

司法:民事、刑事

  民事:被告所在地,英美国家可以是偶然就有管辖权,大陆法系国家获得管辖权的基础大多要有惯常居所。

刑事:主观所在地与客观所在地

      苏格兰洛克比空难?

      荷花号: